Loving Someone for Their Potential Instead of Who They Actually Are
Estimated read time: 6 minutes
There's a version of a relationship in my life I've been in love with for years. Warm phone calls. Real interest in my life. Someone who shows up the way I show up. The problem is that version doesn't exist anywhere except in my head, and I spent a very long time treating it like it was just around the corner, one more honest conversation, one more attempt, away from becoming real.
The actual relationship looks different. A text that checks a box without ever really reaching me. A conversation that stays entirely on the surface, no matter how much I try to deepen it. A closeness I keep hoping we'll eventually have, that never quite arrives no matter how long I wait or how much I give in the meantime.
For a long time I couldn't tell the difference between those two things. I'd hang up the phone feeling hollow, and instead of sitting with that feeling, I'd already be explaining it away. She's just not a big talker. That's just how she shows love. Next time will probably be different. I was so busy defending the potential version that I never let myself fully feel what the actual one was doing to me.
Potential Isn't a Person
Here's what I've had to learn slowly, and it's still one of the hardest things I've ever had to accept: you can love someone's potential with your whole heart and still be genuinely lonely in the relationship you actually have with them. Those two things aren't contradictory. They can both be true, for years, without either one canceling the other out.
Potential is seductive because it's built entirely out of hope, and hope doesn't require any evidence at all. You can hold onto a version of someone that's kind, present, and finally capable of the closeness you've always wanted, and you can hold onto it indefinitely, because nothing about hoping requires the actual person to ever confirm it. The real relationship, meanwhile, keeps handing you evidence, quietly, every single time you interact. You just have to be willing to actually look at it instead of explaining it away in real time.
I don't think loving someone's potential is wrong. I think the mistake is treating potential like a promise instead of what it actually is, which is a possibility that a person gets to choose or not choose, on their own timeline, regardless of how much you want it or how long you're willing to wait for it.
How You Feel Is Information
I used to treat my own feelings in this relationship as something to manage, not something to trust. If I felt hollow after a phone call, my first instinct was to ask what I'd done wrong, or how I could explain the conversation differently, rather than asking a much simpler question: how do I actually feel after being around this person, and what does that feeling keep trying to tell me?
That question felt almost disloyal the first time I let myself ask it honestly. It felt like betrayal, like I was giving up on someone I loved. But noticing how you feel around a person isn't the same as giving up on them. It's just finally being honest about the relationship you're actually in, instead of the one you keep hoping is right around the corner.
If you consistently feel smaller after being with someone, more anxious, more like you have to earn something you shouldn't have to earn, that feeling is real data, whether or not the person intends any harm at all. Intention and impact are different things. You're allowed to notice the impact, even toward someone whose intentions you don't doubt.
The Overgiving Was Never Really About Them
For years, I gave more than I received in this relationship, and I told myself that was just generosity, just how I love people. Some of that was true. But if I'm honest, a piece of it was something else entirely: a quiet bet that if I gave enough, tried hard enough, stayed patient enough, eventually the version I was hoping for would finally show up. Every phone call, every effort to reach across the distance, was partly an offering and partly a bid, whether I admitted that to myself or not.
That's a painful thing to recognize, because it means some of what looked like love was also, quietly, an attempt to earn something that was never mine to earn in the first place. Closeness isn't something you can accumulate enough effort to unlock in someone who isn't able to offer it.
You can love someone patiently and completely, and still never get back the specific thing you kept hoping your patience would eventually purchase.
Watching myself build something different with my own children made this impossible to keep avoiding. I could see, clearly, the ease I wanted them to have with me, the closeness I never wanted them to have to wonder about or work for. And the more real that became in my own home, the harder it got to keep pretending the waiting elsewhere was ever going to resolve itself.
What Actually Helps
Separate who they are from who you wish they were. Not as a punishment, just as an honest inventory. Write down, if it helps, what the actual relationship gives you, not the hoped-for one. That list is uncomfortable to make, but it's far more useful than the version built entirely out of what might happen someday.
Let yourself grieve the version that isn't coming. This is different from giving up on the person. It's acknowledging that the relationship you've been quietly waiting for may not be the relationship this person is able or willing to give you, and that gap deserves real grief, not just quiet, ongoing patience.
Give what you can offer without requiring a return. You can still love someone, show up for them, stay in relationship with them, without the giving being a bid for something specific in exchange. The shift isn't necessarily about giving less. It's about giving without the invisible IOU attached, so the giving doesn't keep costing you the disappointment of a return that never comes.
Let their actual behavior, not their potential, inform how much you invest. This doesn't mean writing anyone off. It means calibrating your expectations, your emotional investment, and your boundaries around who someone has consistently shown themselves to be, not who they might become if you just give it a little more time.
What I Hope You Take With You
If you've spent years hoping someone would finally become the person you needed them to be, that hope wasn't foolish, and it doesn't mean you loved them wrong. It means you loved generously, maybe more generously than the relationship was able to hold.
You're allowed to keep loving someone and still see them clearly. You're allowed to stop waiting for potential to arrive and start responding to who's actually in front of you. That isn't giving up. It's finally being honest enough to stop grieving quietly, in small doses, every time the real version shows up instead of the one you were hoping for.
Something You Can Try
Think of one relationship where you've been waiting for someone to become a different version of themselves. Write down two short lists, side by side.
On one side: what this person has actually, consistently given you, in real interactions, not in your hopes for them. On the other: what you've been waiting for, the version you keep extending patience toward.
You don't have to do anything with those two lists right away. Just let yourself see them clearly, side by side, instead of blended together the way they've probably been living in your head for a long time.